What is truth?

The origin of the word “truth” is “faith.”

Definition of Truth from Dictionary.com

1. true or actual state of the matter.

 

2. conformity with fact or reality.

3. a verified or indisputable fact, proposition, principle, or the like: mathematical truths.

4. the state or character of being true.

5. actuality or actual existence.

6. an obvious or accepted fact; truism; platitude.

7. honesty; integrity; truthfulness.

8. (often initial capital letter) ideal or fundamental reality apart from and transcending perceived experience: the basic truths of life.

9. agreement with a standad or original.

Wikipedia | Truth Theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

 

Truth Theories

Correspondence Theory
Something is true when it conforms to reality. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle. Correspondence theory practically operates on the assumption that truth is a matter of accurately copying what was much later called “Objective reality” and then representing it in thoughts, words and other symbols.

Coherence Theory
Truth is whatever fits within entire system.

Constructivist theory
Holds that truth is constructed by social processes, is historically and culturally specific, and that it is in part shaped through the power struggles within a community.

Consensus Theory
Holds that truth is whatever is agreed upon, or in some versions, might come to be agreed upon, by some specified group.

Philosophers

 Nietzsche

Friedrich Nietzsche believed the search for truth or ‘the will to truth’ was a consequence of the will to power of philosophers. He thought that truth should be used as long as it promoted life and the will to power, and he thought untruth was better than truth if it had this life enhancement as a consequence. As he wrote in Beyond Good and Evil, “The falseness of a judgment is to us not necessarily an objection to a judgment… The question is to what extent it is life-advancing, life-preserving, species-preserving, perhaps even species-breeding…” (aphorism 4). He proposed the will to power as a truth only because according to him it was the most life affirming and sincere perspective one could have.

Robert Wicks discusses Nietzsche’s basic view of truth as follows:

Some scholars regard Nietzsche’s 1873 unpublished essay, “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense” (”Ãœber Wahrheit und Lüge im außermoralischen Sinn”) as a keystone in his thought. In this essay, Nietzsche rejects the idea of universal constants, and claims that what we call “truth” is only “a mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms.” His view at this time is that arbitrariness completely prevails within human experience: concepts originate via the very artistic transference of nerve stimuli into images; “truth” is nothing more than the invention of fixed conventions for merely practical purposes, especially those of repose, security and consistence.

the dichotomy between ‘absolute = perfect’ and ‘relative = imperfect’ has been superseded in all fields of scientific thought, where “it is generally recognized that there is no absolute truth but nevertheless that there are objectively valid laws and principles”.

(JLRyan says)  Tell me, how can a system that uses FACTS and LOGIC to refute the ABSOLUTE TRUTH OF the Bible, also say that there is no such thing as one truth? The very foundation of argument for the atheist fails because it relies upon that which they are denying!

Christian Truth

http://www.absolute–truth.com/

Absolute Truth – Inflexible Reality
“Absolute truth” is defined as inflexible reality: fixed, invariable, unalterable facts. For example, it is a fixed, invariable, unalterable fact that there are absolutely no square circles and there are absolutely no round squares.

Absolute Truth vs. Relativism
While absolute truth is a logical necessity, there are some religious orientations (atheistic humanists, for example) who argue against the existence of absolute truth. Humanism’s exclusion of God necessitates moral relativism. Humanist John Dewey (1859-1952), co-author and signer of the Humanist Manifesto 1 (1933), declared, “There is no God and there is no soul. Hence, there are no needs for the props of traditional religion. With dogma and creed excluded, then immutable truth is also dead and buried. There is no room for fixed, natural law or moral absolutes.” Humanists believe one should do, as one feels is right.

Absolute Truth – A Logical Necessity
You can’t logically argue against the existence of absolute truth. To argue against something is to establish that a truth exists. You cannot argue against absolute truth unless an absolute truth is the basis of your argument. Consider a few of the classic arguments and declarations made by those who seek to argue against the existence of absolute truth…

“There are no absolutes.” First of all, the relativist is declaring there are absolutely no absolutes. That is an absolute statement. The statement is logically contradictory. If the statement is true, there is, in fact, an absolute – there are absolutely no absolutes.

“Truth is relative.” Again, this is an absolute statement implying truth is absolutely relative. Besides positing an absolute, suppose the statement was true and “truth is relative.” Everything including that statement would be relative. If a statement is relative, it is not always true. If “truth is relative” is not always true, sometimes truth is not relative. This means there are absolutes, which means the above statement is false. When you follow the logic, relativist arguments will always contradict themselves.

“Who knows what the truth is, right?” In the same sentence the speaker declares that no one knows what the truth is, then he turns around and asks those who are listening to affirm the truth of his statement.

“No one knows what the truth is.” The speaker obviously believes his statement is true.

There are philosophers who actually spend countless hours toiling over thick volumes written on the “meaninglessness” of everything. We can assume they think the text is meaningful! Then there are those philosophy teachers who teach their students, “No one’s opinion is superior to anyone else’s. There is no hierarchy of truth or values. Anyone’s viewpoint is just as valid as anyone else’s viewpoint. We all have our own truth.” Then they turn around and grade the papers!

Absolute Truth – Morality
Morality is a facet of absolute truth. Thus, relativists often declare, “It’s wrong for you to impose your morals on me.” By declaring something is wrong, the relativist is contradicting himself by imposing his morals upon you.

You might hear, “There is no right, there is no wrong!” You must ask, is that statement right or wrong?

If you catch a relativist in the act of doing something they know is absolutely wrong, and you try to point it out to them, they may respond in anger, “Truth is relative! There’s no right and there’s no wrong! We should be able to do whatever we want!” If that is a true statement and there is no right and there is no wrong, and everyone should be able to do whatever they want, then why have they become angry? What basis do they have for their anger? You can’t be appalled by an injustice, or anything else for that matter, unless an absolute has somehow been violated.

Relativists often argue, “Everybody can believe whatever they want!” It makes us wonder, why are they arguing? We find it amusing that relativists are the ones who want to argue about relativism.

If you attempt to tell a relativist the difference between right and wrong, you will no doubt hear, “None of that is true! We make our own reality!” If that’s true, and we all create our own reality, then our statement of moral accountability is merely a figment of the relativist’s imagination. If a relativist has a problem with a statement of absolute morality, the relativist should take the issue up with himself.

Absolute Truth – The Conclusion
We all know there is absolute truth. It seems the more we argue against it, the more we prove its existence. Reality is absolute whether you feel like being cogent or not. Philosophically, relativism is contradictory. Practically, relativism is anarchy. The world is filled with absolute truth.

A relativist maintains that everyone should be able to believe and do whatever he wants. Of course, this view is emotionally satisfying, until that person comes home to find his house has been robbed, or someone seeks to hurt him, or someone cuts in front of him in line. No relativist will come home to find his house robbed and say, “Oh, how wonderful that the burglar was able to fulfill his view of reality by robbing my house. Who am I to impose my view of right and wrong on this wonderful burglar?” Quite the contrary, the relativist will feel violated just like anyone else. And then, of course, it’s OK for him to be a relativist, as long as the “system” acts in an absolutist way by protecting his “unalienable rights.”

You can tell a lot about a girl by how she fares in life’s struggles. It doesn’t matter if she knows the Bible, sings like a bird, recites stirring prayers–it’s the troubles that give her away. Nothing like hard times for showing who you really are. I should know. My own personal issues have recently highlighted my own weak spots for the world to see. Contrary to what I’d like you to think, I’m not a perfect Christian.

Looking back over the past few weeks, I see frenzy. I may look alright on the outside, but inside it’s an emotional boxing match. Disappointment about a guy I really care about (Punch), turning 39 this week  (Punch), dating stress (Punch), economic business challenges (Punch, Punch, Punch). A knock out. My lack of spiritual strength to endure these situations–and a few more–caused me to lose site of my first love and only hope. Jesus Christ.  

It starts in the heart. The heart is like a compass; it must point to the heavens–or your feet will go astray. Take one step in the wrong direction–and if you don’t turn around–you’ll walk into a pit. One bad decision leads a thousand more.

Veering into the red zone, I seek my own remedies instead of trusting God. I’m searching for something again, forgetting that it’s already found. My flesh leads the way. It delights in the sizzle of the world, the false promises of desire. In just a few days, I wander from God’s will, heading back down the path from which I came. A homogenized version of what God has called me to be.

So now what?

Admit defeat? Yes.

Confess my sin? Yes.

Repent. Turn around and face God, no matter if I want to or not? Yes! Yes! and Yes!

Why?

Because I know the truth. I KNOW the truth! Even when I don’t FEEL like the truth is the truth, the truth is still the truth. The truth will always be here, whether I chose to participate or not. Honestly, I was having a great time heading in the wrong direction. It was fun for a moment, but I’m neither deceived nor ignorant of the enemy’s devices. ”There is a way that seems right to a person, but in the end, leads to death.” (Proverbs 14:12)

I choose life.  (Jn. 10:10)

So here I stand. A 39 year old single businesswoman, living life on God’s terms. Am I humbled? Yes. Weak? Yes. Broken? Yes. That’s how God wants me. Dependent on Him alone as I walk in the light and fight the good fight of faith. (1 Jn 1:7, 1 Tim. 6:12) Troubles come and go–but The Truth remains; and by His grace, so will I.